|
From "A
PRACTICAL GUIDE TO RABBINIC COUNSELING." By Rabbi Maurice Lamm &
Dodi Lee Lamm, M.S.W. Edited by Yisrael N. Levitz and Abraham J.
Twerski. Published by feldheim.com.
[This article, originally written for
rabbis, was adapted for anyone who needs to comfort a close friend
or relative. –Ed.]
One's
first encounter with a mourner usually comes upon hearing the news
of the death. The mourner may not have yet completely absorbed the
finality of what happened. In that first encounter with the newly
bereaved, one needs to connect both empathically and concretely.
"When?" "How?" and "Where did it happen?" are appropriate questions.
They are concrete and they simply seek information, but they allow
the mourner to verbally relay a story that often feels surrealistic,
even when the death was expected.
Other informational questions are also important to explore at
this time. "Where were you when it happened?" "How did you find
out?" "Do the other family members know?" "Have any arrangements for
a burial been made?" This begins to connect one to the experience of
the mourner. The mourner may not come to grips with the reality of
the loss for a while, but this concrete stage is an important
beginning.
This is also the time to let the mourner know that everything
that can be done to give the deceased a respectful, honorable
funeral is being done. At a time of total helplessness in being able
to bring the deceased back to life, it is comforting for the person
to know that an honorable funeral is being arranged. The mourner
might even find that helping with the funeral arrangements is a
great source of comfort...
Following the funeral, one needs to assess the mourner's desire
for solitude upon returning from the cemetery and the immediate days
following, and respect his preference. Solitude gives the mourner
space to think and get past many perceived obstacles to the problem
of continuing life after experiencing the ugliness of death and its
shocking finality.
It is similarly important to respect the mourner's wish for
silence. This is the reason why consolers traditionally need to wait
for the mourner to speak first, thereby allowing him or her to set
the agenda for their shiva call. Many mourners express their clear
wish for everyone to "stay away." This should be honored. Silence
gives mourners the space to reflect, feel what they need to feel,
and collect themselves. Sometimes silence speaks volumes. Just being
with the mourner sans speaking banalities and trivialities is
exactly the support the mourner needs.
There is a counseling approach called active listening.
Communication comes in all forms, including speech, emotional
response, and body language. For example, it is important to
maintain good eye contact. It conveys to the mourner that you are
not uncomfortable dealing with death and listening to the mourner's
unvarnished feelings. Empathy can often be conveyed with a calm
presence, eye contact, attentiveness, and a display of genuine
interest. These are very effective in establishing a connection with
the mourner and are also central components for consoling the
bereaved.
Reflecting back is a way of letting the mourner know that you
understand correctly what has been said and that you are listening
with interest. The mourner may tend to contradict or even repeat
himself because he is in the process of working through difficult
emotions. When you reflect back, you make it permissible for the
mourner to revisit and clarify his thoughts and feelings once again.
It is a way of showing respect for the process of grieving and
consoling. Paraphrasing a mourner's most important comments lends
them importance while checking them for accuracy.
Some emotions exhibited while grieving can be overwhelming and
frightening to both the mourner and the listener. When a rabbi is
able to "mirror feelings" and reflect back a sense that the emotions
are significant, he makes it safe for the mourner to express all
that he is feeling. A mourner might say, "I don't know what to do,"
and you might reply, "It sounds like you are feeling a bit lost
right now."
It is important to ask questions rather than to toss out stock
answers. Mourners do not want to hear theological insights,
justifications, apologetics, comparative war stories, or even your
personal approach on how to make peace with tragedy. Empathy and
understanding are what is called for - active listening and mirrored
feelings, not long discourses on why bad things happen to good
people.
There are also things that shouldn't be said, because they show
insensitivity and a lack of empathy. Don't say, for example: "It
could've been worse," "You need to get on with your life," "You'll
have other children," "Don't take it so hard," or "Other people have
lost their beloved." Remember, too, that the word "beloved" may not
be appropriate. The deceased may not have in fact been loved.
Handle memories deftly. Screened memories, those that are not
remembered accurately but as the individual wants or needs them to
be, are common for mourners. These memories may not be objectively
accurate, but they are often comforting to the person who is telling
them. We unconsciously choose what we can handle and avoid that
which is too threatening, primarily because it hurts too much.
Sometimes good memories become paramount to the exclusion of other
memories that might threaten how the mourner wants to remember the
deceased. It is not necessary to correct those memories. Again, we
are there just to listen.
There are several other important considerations to be mindful of
when consoling the bereaved. Narrative, for example, is the
quintessential agenda of all consolation strategies. This means that
mourners should be encouraged to speak of their loss. Perhaps the
most helpful words of consolation are: "Tell me what she was like."
The mourner's repeating of this narrative, sometimes with a new
twist or emphasis (depending on the listeners and the person's own
new insights) brings him closer to closure. By the end of a
successful shiva, the mourner has packaged a cogent story, with a
beginning and an end and a logical progression of events to store in
his mind for safekeeping. Slowly it dawns on him that he now
understands what happened and that he can place it in its proper
proportion. He is, of course, still bereaved.
Encourage the retelling of stories ― about the deceased, about
his death, about his final days ― and the feelings that accompanied
these events. The more one tells the story, the more one is able to
make the death more real. Telling the story with all its pain is a
partner to the healing process.
Top of Page
The
Invention of Hope
by Maurice Lamm
Judaism is
not a skein of charming folkways. It is idealism and faith, law
and love, literature and history and a way of life. It connects
people to God and creates a working relationship. The holyday
prayer book lists the many ways we love God: "We are your sons,
and you
our Father...We are your friends, and you are our beloved...."
But less known is the realization
that Judaism may have made one of its greatest contributions
when it actualized a dormant human feature that hides shyly in
everyone's heart: Hope. Hope is the sheer will to live on in the
face of despair, to picture a better future, to spark a rise to
success and an end to suffering. The Jewish people survived
pogroms and holocausts because of this one quality.
Think of it: there is virtually no
forward movement in life, no projecting and no planning, unless
it is preceded by a robust Hope that craves some distant goal.
Hope performs remarkable calisthenics. If you lose hope in
something, you instinctively hope for a different objective.
Hope changes itself in tandem with your personal development -
if you are successful your hope leaps ahead to goals
out-of-reach; if you are young, your Hopes are probably
ecstatic; as you get older the worn mind looks for other
pastures. What are the hidden mechanisms that trigger this Hope
that drives us into the future? What enables this boldness, this
resilience, this "impossible" vision?
If you look under the hood of Hope,
you will find a remarkable spiritual engine whose major
component is Faith - a belief in One God. There is a specific
moment in history when a spiritual revolution overturned man's
outlook on the world - the emergence of the idea of One God. It
snatched Hope - which had been a charming gadget buried in a
Pandora's box - and shaped it into one of the most powerful
forces in human evolution and implanted it into everyone's
imagination.
It accomplished this by making a
striking observation that released a flood of spiritual
energies. It affirmed that God actually listens to people who
petition Him, that He desires their good, and that he responds -
for good or ill. This was a radical idea at the time (perhaps
even now), and it struck at the pith of the pagan mind which
considered a relationship between a man and a god to be
untenable.
By claiming a belief in one God who
is a single, almighty, and totally ethical entity, who
nonetheless responds to insignificant people like you and me,
Judaism challenged Paganism in a war to the death to mold the
minds of the civilized world. The combat swirled around these
questions:
Is it possible that a supernatural
power was interested in earthly problems?
Does God have the power to implement
such solutions in real time?
Is it sensible for a person to hope
for a distant, unrealizable possibility?
The Jewish prophets thundered "yes!"
to all three questions, and vanquished a paganism that said
"no!" to them all. By breaking the shackles of pagan dogma, the
Jewish faith empowered people to Hope, and built it into the
powerful notion that it is today. How could anyone make a
personal appeal to a force that is indiscriminate, unresponsive,
and impersonal? Whom do you petition for relief? To which window
do you bring your complaint, if there is no one at the desk? Is
there anything at all, that any one at all, can do to make life
just a bit easier? Because it - Judaism - spoke of a God in
heaven to whom people could direct their dreams with great
enthusiasm, and who could respond positively to their cries, it
transfigured Hope from a nebulous, gaseous, fanciful, and even
dangerous myth (as the Greeks labeled it) into a serious,
structured, spiritual pursuit that Judaism proclaimed. Hope
illuminated the distant horizons of a dark world.
The 19th century Christian
existentialist philosopher, Søren Kierkegaard, believed that
this commitment to Hope, "…made the Jewish religion, of all
religions, outspoken optimism. Greek pagan thought is
optimistic, but is tinged with deep melancholy, and had no
Divine sanction. Judaism is Divinely-sanctioned optimism, sheer
promise for this life."
It could not be otherwise. A religion
that taught the world that every person is created in the image
of God had to be optimistic and hopeful. If we are spiritual
facsimiles of God, we have the power to be creative, as He is,
and we can strive to modify or eliminate suffering, tragedy, and
evil of all kinds. By stimulating people not to accept evil
passively, and encouraging them to do combat against the horrors
of life, faith in God became a source of great Hope. Religion
told the ancient world that when things are bad, we can
reasonably hope for a new beginning.
This revolution translated beliefs
into practical propositions. To the man on the street this meant
that he had an address to whom he could appeal when he was in
trouble, even if it was in heaven. It meant that God could, and
very well might, respond with help - perhaps a new cure or a new
opportunity. Immediately, the earth became a friendlier, cozier,
more hospitable place in which to spend a lifetime.
If paganism had succeeded, the
quality of Hope built into every human being would have been
useless, the spiritual tonsils of the human imagination, benign
but ineffectual - a joke in the throat of man's desperation. The
One-God revolution made radical breaks with Paganism that
swiftly transformed man's thinking, but the spark that began it
all was Judaism's belief in One God who created the world with
design, purpose and meaning. It chose personal destiny over
random fate.
The Greeks believed that whatever
happens to a person is entirely the result of random forces. If
disease strikes a person, it does so by sheer coincidence.
Victims of a disaster are simply "accidents," not subjects, of
history. Whether you love or hurt your neighbor, whether you
abuse your wife or respect her, whether or not you defraud your
business partner, are matters that have no bearing on what
befalls you - because nature has no master design and no master
designer, no purpose and, therefore, no meaning. Life is a
collection of random events. Good luck.
This is the reason whole pagan
societies like Mesopotamia historically were shot through with
depression and anxiety. If you were a Mesopotamian, how could
you make sense of your life? These doubts were the seeds of
hopelessness that characterized Greek tragedy. That is why the
overwhelming majority of thinkers in pagan Greece and Rome, in
poems and plays, mocked the idea of hope and called it a fairy
tale. These illustrious cultures brought the world a cornucopia
of aesthetics, poetry, logic, and philosophy -but they robbed
humanity of a rudimentary element of living that sustains people
every day of their lives.
The Jewish idea of One God, however,
was a shaft of light that shone through the thick clouds of
Pagan culture and radiated the idea that the world is actually
good, despite rampant suffering; that people are actually
people, not discarded debris tossed helter-skelter on the
turbulent ocean of history, subject not to a random fate, but to
Divine destiny. The belief in One God ultimately dominated all
civilization and paganism quickly began to fade. Hope instantly
sprang into existence, creating a new reality. Monotheistic
religion became the cradle of optimism, while Paganism suffered
fits of melancholy until finally it collapsed.
Could the Jews have lived through the
twentieth century without Hope? How could Jews have survived
their children being clubbed to death by storm troopers? Only
with Hope. Elie Wiesel found a sign over the doors to the
Breslav synagogue in Warsaw that read "Gevalt Jews! Don't give
up."
How curious to feel the flesh of hope
in today's events. A thousand years ago, Christian crusaders
incinerated our children, our homes, and our synagogues. At the
end of this Christian millennium, Cardinal O'Connor of New York
wrote a letter that is a historic document. It is a Rosh
Hashanah greeting to Jews - an apology for the misdeeds of the
last thousand years, saying that his people repent, "do Teshuva."
He prays for a longer Jewish-Catholic embrace and wishes us
Shana Tovah.
We raged against the dying of the
light, we hoped against hope, and we succeeded. The word, Hope,
is Tikvah in Hebrew. Is it coincidental that "Hatikvah" is
Israel's national anthem? If we look at the bottom line today,
at the end of our secular millennium, we can say proudly and
confidently that our faith in God gave us Hope and that our Hope
sustained us. Thank God.
Rabbi Maurice Lamm is an
internationally renowned author, President of the National
Institute for Jewish Hospice and Professor at Yeshiva
University's Rabbinical Seminary in New York. He was the rabbi
of Beth Jacob Congregation in Beverly Hills from 1972 until his
retirement in 1985. Rabbi Lamm's latest book, The Power of Hope,
was recently translated into Spanish, Greek and Chinese. His
most popular work, The Jewish Way in Death and Mourning, is
considered one of the seven best Jewish books by the New York
Times. Rabbi Lamm is also author of The Jewish Way in Love and
Marriage, Becoming a Jew and Living Torah in America.
Top of Page
Life After Death: A Parable
|
Man has
had an abiding faith in a world beyond the grave. The
conviction in a life after death, improvable but
unshakeable, has been cherished since the beginning of
thinking man's life on earth. It makes its appearance in
religious literature not as fiat, commanded irrevocably by
an absolute God, but rather arises plant-like, growing and
developing naturally in the soul. It then sprouts forth
through sublime prayer and sacred hymn. Only later does it
become extrapolated in complicated metaphysical speculation.
The
after-life has not been "thought up"; it is not a rational
construction of a religious philosophy imposed on believing
man. It has sprung from within the hearts of masses of men,
a sort of consensus Pentium, inside out, a hope beyond and
above the rational, a longing for the warm sun of eternity.
The after-life is not a theory to be proven logically or
demonstrated by rational analysis. It is axiomatic. It is to
the soul what oxygen is to the lungs. There is little
meaning to life, to God, to man's constant strivings, to all
of his achievements, unless there is a world beyond the
grave.
The
Bible, so vitally concerned with the actions of man in this
world, and agonizing over his day-to-day morals, is
relatively silent about the world-to-come. But, precisely,
this very silence is a tribute to the awesome concept, taken
for granted like the oxygen in the atmosphere. No elaborate
apologia, no complex abstractions are necessary. The Bible,
which records the sacred dialogue between God and man,
surely must be founded on the soul's eternal existence. It
was not a matter of debate, as it became later in history
when whole movements interpreted scripture with slavish
literalism and could not find the after-life crystallized in
letters and words, or later, when philosophers began to
apply the yardstick of rationalism to man's every hope and
idea and sought empirical proof for this conviction of the
soul. It was a fundamental creed, always present, though
rarely articulated.
If the
soul is immortal then death cannot be considered a final
act. If the life of the soul is to be continued, then death,
however bitter, is deprived of its treacherous power of
casting mourners into a lifetime of agonizing hopelessness
over an irretrievable loss. Terrible though it is, death is
a threshold to a new world-the "world-to-come."
A Parable
An
imaginative and telling analogy that conveys the hope and
confidence in the after-life, even though this hope must be
refracted through the prism of death, is the tale of twins
awaiting birth in the mother's womb. It was created by a
contemporary Israeli rabbi, the late Y. M. Tuckachinsky.
Imagine
twins growing peacefully in the warmth of the womb. Their
mouths are closed, and they are being fed via the navel.
Their lives are serene. The whole world, to these brothers,
is the interior of the womb. Who could conceive anything
larger, better, more comfortable? They begin to wonder: "We
are getting lower and lower. Surely if it continues, we will
exit one day. What will happen after we exit?"
Now the
first infant is a believer. He is heir to a religious
tradition which tells him that there will be a "new life"
after this wet and warm existence of the womb. A strange
belief, seemingly without foundation, but one to which he
holds fast. The second infant is a thorough-going skeptic.
Mere stories do not deceive him. He believes only in that
which can be demonstrated. He is enlightened, and tolerates
no idle conjecture. What is not within one's experience can
have no basis in one's imagination.
Says the
faithful brother: "After our 'death' here, there will be a
new great world. We will eat through the mouth! We will see
great distances, and we will hear through the ears on the
sides of our heads. Why, our feet will be straightened! And
our heads-up and free, rather than down and boxed in."
Replies
the skeptic: "Nonsense. You're straining your imagination
again. There is no foundation for this belief. It is only
your survival instinct, an elaborate defense mechanism, a
historically-conditioned subterfuge. You are looking for
something to calm your fear of 'death.' There is only this
world. There is no world-to-come!"
"Well
then," asks the first, "what do you say it will be like?"
The
second brother snappily replies with all the assurance of
the slightly knowledgeable: "We will go with a bang. Our
world will collapse and we will sink into oblivion. No more.
Nothing. Black void. An end to consciousness. Forgotten.
This may not be a comforting thought, but it is a logical
one."
Suddenly
the water inside the womb bursts. The womb convulses.
Upheaval. Turmoil. Writhing. Everything lets loose. Then a
mysterious pounding -- a crushing, staccato pounding.
Faster, faster, lower, lower.
The
believing brother exits. Tearing himself from the womb, he
falls outward. The second brother shrieks, startled by the
"accident" befallen his brother. He bewails and bemoans the
tragedy--the death of a perfectly fine fellow. Why? Why? Why
didn't he take better care? Why did he fall into that
terrible abyss?
As he
thus laments, he hears a head-splitting cry, and a great
tumult from the black abyss, and he trembles: "Oh my! What a
horrible end! As I predicted!"
Meanwhile
as the skeptic brother mourns, his "dead" brother has been
born into the "new" world. The headsplitting cry is a sign
of health and vigor, and the tumult is really a chorus of
mazel tons sounded by the waiting family thanking God for
the birth of a healthy son.
Indeed,
in the words of a contemporary thinker, man comes from the
darkness of the "not yet," and proceeds to the darkness of
the "no more." While it is difficult to imagine the "not
yet" it is more difficult to picture the "no more."
As we
separate and "die" from the womb, only to be born to life,
so we separate and die from our world, only to be re-born to
life eternal. The exit from the womb is the birth of the
body. The exit from the body is the birth of the soul. As
the womb requires a gestation period of nine months, the
world requires a residence of 70 or 80 years. As the womb is
prozdor,
an anteroom preparatory to life, so our present existence is
a prozdor to the world beyond.
Reprinted from
ChabadofBeverlywood.com
Top of Page
|
A Tribute to Hospice Personnel
A Rumor of Angels
by
Maurice Lamm
There is a fascinating
insight that maintains that we could prove the existence of God
-- not by scientific theories, nor by scripture, nor by miracles
— but by the stunning existence of people who act selflessly,
without being commanded, without being compensated, without fuss
and without fanfare. They are unremarkable, unassuming paragons
of virtue. Jewish tradition calls this Kiddush Ha’shem,
the sanctification of God’s name. People commonly call such
individuals “angels.” Spiritual-minded people call the stories
of such simple, yet incredible, individuals: a rumor of angels.
This fact, by itself, could testify to the existence of God, an
all-wise Creator who ordered the world with a hidden
infrastructure of decency. “You don’t have to be a saint to be
an angel”, the great doctor in Africa said; but you do have to
be a selfless, self-sacrificing person. If that is who you are,
you will be testifying to the existence of a benevolent creator.
Watch a mother
caring for her sick child, kissing and hugging her, hovering
over her bed all night, offering to be sick in place of her
little girl. That is a rumor of angels. If a person can become
an “angel,” then a God of goodness must exist.
There is “God” in “good”.
Excerpted from
CONSOLATION
Top of Page
To
my fellow bereaved parents:
I stumbled upon this beautiful piece on the internet. I found it
VERY moving and powerful.
Baruch Cohen
“I Do
Believe”
by Jennifer Janiszewski
www.words-of-sympathy.com
There
is nothing I can do
to make him come back.
There are no words I can say
that can replace the words
you long to hear.
There
are no answers I can give,
that will satisfy your
questions.
There is not another soul I
can introduce you to that
will ever replace his
and, there is no love I can
offer that will ever replace the love you shared.
I
cannot promise your broken heart will ever be complete.
I will not say it could have
been worse
I will not deny it was a
tragedy
I will not lie and tell you
he will come back.
He
never really left.
I
do promise he hears you when you speak.
I will say he loves you no
matter the distance.
I will not deny he is in a
better place
And, I will not lie; he is
waiting to greet you someday.
He is with you in every step you take.
He is in everything you do,
He is the air you breathe,
He is every beat of your
heart.
"
He is like the wind.
You can not see him...
but you will always feel him."
Top of Page
Dos
and Don’ts for Visitors to Make a Compassionate and Proper
Condolence Call
by Maurice Lamm
-
Allow mourners
to begin the conversation and set the tone at all times.
This is a religious must. Be especially sensitive in
situations such as suicide, young deaths, or guilt-ridden
grief.
-
Do not to try
to fix the problems and fears of the grief-stricken.
Recognize that we cannot solve the mourners’ problems no
matter how well equipped we are and how hard we try.
-
Be an open
listener. Allow mourners an opportunity to express all of
their feelings in a safe, non-combative, non-threatening, and
nonjudgmental atmosphere so they can break through their
loneliness and share their pain and loss for a short time. The
grief-stricken need friends to validate their grief, not to
interpret or manipulate their feelings.
-
Listen
attentively, not casually. We should demonstrate concern
for mourners’ well-being. We should wear a mien of
seriousness, not sadness, on our faces.
-
Sometimes
silence is best. We are better advised to say nothing at
all than to be endlessly talkative.
-
Our
conversation should be not only distracting but therapeutic as
well. The small talk of mourners should trigger our
interest, even though it may not be of world-shaking
significance.
-
Speak of the
departed. This may appear hurtful at first, but in fact it
helps mourners unburden themselves. We should feel free to
recall events in the deceased’s life, the departed one’s
opinions on important matters, and the quality of the
deceased’s relationships. Whether or not the deceased was an
important personality, every individual has redeeming features
and has done good things. We should seek these features in our
memory and speak them aloud.
-
Use humor
wisely. Sometimes joking and raucous stories bring relief
to comforters, but these things are entirely inappropriate for
mourners. Conversely, light-hearted, even humorous, anecdotes
of the deceased person, spoken respectfully, are quite in
place. In fact, it is altogether proper to provide for some
moments of appropriate levity to relieve the thick,
emotion-laden atmosphere—but only if we feel at ease and if we
able to deliver such anecdotes with sensitivity.
-
Do not dwell on
our own mourning experiences. This may appear to belittle
the grief of the newly bereaved. Consolation is not about how
we suffered or how we experienced grief. Mourners are at the
center of concern; everything else should be peripheral.
-
Remind
mourners, whenever possible, that their feelings are normal.
Let them know that the seemingly “crazy” symptoms of grief are
universal and that the vast majority of people have
successfully dealt with loss in the past.
-
Encourage
mourners’ independence and offer positive feedback on their
successful coping or small victories in the progress of their
bereavement. Believe in their ability to recover and
grieve successfully. Giving people courage makes them
courageous. Phillips Brooks once said: “There is in every man
something greater than he had begun to dream of. Men are
nobler than they think themselves.”2
-
Do not offer
gratuitous psychological advice. Even the most talented
and capable comforters must be wary of falling into this trap.
-
Remember that
there is no religious preference for visiting a house of
mourning—whether by day or by night. For non-relatives,
visits may be delayed until the second day after interment.
However, if for some reason this delay cannot be arranged,
visits may be made even on the very first day. Formally and
traditionally, consoling the bereaved begins at the cemetery
when mourners leave the grave and pass through parallel rows
of friends and relatives as they exit.
-
We do not
customarily pay condolence calls on the Sabbath or holidays.
These are days when traditional Jews do not mourn publicly,
since mourning would conflict with the joyous spirit of the
celebration for the whole Jewish community. However, mourners
may receive shiva visitation and condolences on certain
special days: chol ha’mo’ed (the weekdays of major
holidays), Rosh Hodesh (the start of a new Jewish month),
Purim, and Hanukkah. Psychologically, of course, grief often
reaches crucial and anguishing proportions during holidays.
Mourners tend, at these times—as on birthdays and
anniversaries, to feel abandoned and alone, truly bereft. So
it is well to visit mourners just before and as soon as
possible at the end of such a traditionally mandated break in
the mourning.
-
Visiting after
Shiva. If we were unable to visit during Shiva, tradition
says that we can continue to express condolences at any time
during the subsequent twelve months upon meeting those
bereaved of parents and during the next thirty days for those
bereaved of other relatives.
-
When mourners
return to work. Sometimes mourners need to conduct
business during Shiva. Sometimes it is even religiously
permissible to do so. In such cases, condolence calls may
still be made to mourners.
-
When making
condolence calls, offer no words of greeting—neither of
welcome nor of farewell. Mourners should not respond
verbally to greetings during the first three days.
Traditionally, mourners nod or convey their acknowledgment of
the presence of comforters in some other way, such as by
repeating a visitor’s name.
-
It is not up to
us as comforters to remind mourners of their religious duties.
For instance, we should not urge a mourner to sit on the shiva
stool (it is not even religiously required that the mourner
always be seated), since our innocent remark may imply to the
mourner that he or she is acting improperly.
As consolers we
should be sensitive to the feelings of the mourners and be
especially alert to any signal that we should leave! There is a
time for all things and surely there is a time for leaving the
house of the bereaved. We should never stay too long, mistakenly
believing that our presence brings an unusual degree of relief
or mistakenly measuring the value of our compassion by the
length of our visit. Upon leaving, we traditionally recite the
following phrase in Hebrew or in English or both: “Ha’makom
yenachem etkhem betokh she’ar avelei Tziyon vi’Yerushalayim”
(May God comfort you among the other mourners of Zion and
Jerusalem).3
We should expect
some unusual behavior during a shiva call, behavior motivated by
Jewish tradition itself. Mourners traditionally do not rise to
greet any guest, no matter what guest’s stature.
Mourners—preferably but not necessarily—sit, even as comforters
are about to leave. Nevertheless, especially during prolonged
visits, mourners need not sit all the time, but may stand and
walk as they desire. At mealtime, in the company of guests,
mourners may sit at the head of the table but on a lower stool.
Top of Page
Transcending the Distress - Itzhak
Perlman
by Maurice Lamm
On Nov.
18,
1995,
Itzhak Perlman, the violinist, came on stage to give
a
concert at Lincoln Center in New York City. If you have ever
been to a
Perlman concert, you know that getting on stage is no small
achievement for
him. He was stricken with polio as a child, and has braces on
both legs and
walks with the aid of two crutches.
To see him walk across the stage one
step at a time, painfully and slowly,
is a sight. He walks painfully, yet
majestically, until he reaches his
chair. Then he sits down,
slowly, puts his crutches on the floor, undoes the
clasps on his legs, tucks one foot
back and extends the other foot forward.
Then he bends down and picks up the
violin, puts it under his chin, nods to
the conductor and proceeds to play.
By now, the audience is used to this ritual. They sit
quietly while he makes
his way across the stage to his chair. They remain
reverently silent while
he undoes the clasps on his legs. They wait until he
is ready to play.
But this time, something went wrong. Just as he
finished the first few bars,
one of the strings on his violin broke. You
could hear it snap—it went
off like gunfire across the room. There was no
mistaking what that sound
meant. There was no mistaking what he had to
do.
People who were there that night thought to themselves: “We
figured that he
would have to get up, put on the clasps again, pick up the
crutches and limp
his way off stage - to either find another violin or else
find another
string for this one, or wait for someone to bring him
another."
But he didn’t. Instead, he waited a moment, closed his eyes
and then
signaled the conductor to begin again. The orchestra began,
and he played
from where he had left off. And he played with such passion
and such power
and such purity, as they had never heard before.
Of course, anyone knows
that it is impossible to play a symphonic work with
just three strings. I know that; you
know that. But that night Itzhak
Perlman refused to know that. You
could see him modulating, changing, and
recomposing the piece in his head. At
one point, it sounded like he was
de-tuning the strings to get new
sounds from them that they had never made
before.
When he finished, there was an awesome
silence in the room. And then people
rose and cheered. There was an
extraordinary outburst of applause from every
corner of the auditorium. Everyone was
on their feet, screaming and
cheering, doing everything they could
to show how much they appreciated what
he had done.
He smiled, wiped the sweat from his brow, raised his bow to
quiet the
audience, and then he said, not boastfully, but in a quiet,
pensive,
reverent tone, “You know, sometimes it is the artist’s task
to find out how
much music you can still make with what you have left."
What a powerful line that is. And who
knows? Perhaps that is the way of
life - not just for an artist but for
all of us. Here is a man who has
prepared all his life to make music on
a violin with four strings, who all
of a sudden, in the middle of a
concert, finds himself with only three
strings, and the music he made that
night with just three strings was more
beautiful, more sacred, more
memorable, than any that he had ever made
before, when he had four strings.
So, perhaps our task in this shaky, fast-changing,
bewildering world in
which we live, is to make music, at first with all that we
have, and then,
when that is no longer possible, to make music with what we
have left.
In this year where so much has been taken from us all, let us
all stop for a
moment, and think how we can make beautiful music with what
we have left.
Excerpted from CONSOLATION, 231, by
Maurice Lamm
Top of Page
 |
 |
For the
Families of the Dying, Coaching as the Hours Wane - A
Condensed Article on Midwifing Death
By
JANE GROSS
Published in the New York Times: May 20, 2006
Greg
Torso's death announced itself with a long exhale and
then silence, as the breath literally left his body.
His mother had been told to expect this, so she was
not scared.
Ms.
Torso had worried that an undertaker would barge
in moments after her 42-year-old son died,
before she had had time to say goodbye. She had
been assured she could spend as much time with
the body as she wanted.
Could
she bathe and dress him? Save a lock of his hair?
Commemorate his passing with wine and reminiscence at
the bedside? All of that was fine, she had been told,
setting the stage for a death that she later said had
left her "on the edge of euphoria."
Ms.
Torso was coached and consoled through the final days
and hours of her son's life, a rarity even under the
umbrella of hospice, which for three decades has
promised Americans a good death, pain-free, peaceful
and shared with loved ones at home.
But
there is a growing realization that hospice has its
limitations. Doctors, nurses, social workers, clerics
and volunteers are rarely there for the final hours,
known as active dying, when a family may need their
comforts the most.
Now
those final moments are a focus of new attention as
hospices broaden their range of services, inspired by
a growing body of research on the very end of life.
More are encouraging the calming properties of music,
meditation, aromatherapy and massage for both patients
and families. Some are increasing the training for
so-called 11th-hour companions who families can
request be with them.
Holding
a dying person's hand may be frightening for a loved
one alone at the bedside. Relatives and friends may
not know that hearing is the last sense to go, and
neglect to soothe the patient with a steady,
reassuring murmur. Leaving the room briefly may mean
missing the moment of passing and always carrying that
regret.
"These
final moments matter, but often, when families and
patients need us most — to explain the process, calm
the situation, take away the negative energy and allow
them to be more present — we aren't there," said Henry
Fersko-Weiss, vice president for counseling services
at Continuum Hospice Care in New York City, which has
a new program that has been keeping vigil with the
dying and their families.
The
American hospice movement has grown from one program
in 1974 to 3,650 in 2004, serving eight million
Americans, according to the National Hospice and
Palliative Care Organization. And more people are
expected to choose hospice care as it extends its
reach into hospitals and nursing homes, where
palliative care is not routinely available. At the
same time, those who seek aggressive treatment up to
the end are welcome at hospice programs that once
turned them away but that are now "open access."
Despite
all these changes, most people, in fear or denial,
wait until the last minute to enroll. That robs them
of the preparation that was so vital to Greg Torso's
mother, Carol, and that hospice leaders, like Andy
Duncan of the national organization, say should be
routine.
"Actually coaching and counseling people through the
time of active dying," Mr. Duncan said, "is something
we hope to convince every hospice in the nation to
do."
Preparing
The
Torsos were the first to use Continuum's vigil
program, which has coached and consoled a dozen
families in its first year.
Greg had survived 15 years with
AIDS
and related cancers. When his doctor said further
treatment would be useless, Mr. Torso enrolled in
hospice, and welcomed extra help from Mr. Fersko-Weiss
and 29 specially trained volunteers who call
themselves doulas.
That is
a Greek term for women who serve, more commonly at
home births to assist both midwife and mother. But the
guiding philosophy is the same and borrows from
Eastern religions: to honor the end of life as well as
the beginning.
Mr.
Fersko-Weiss is a gentle man who insinuates himself
slowly. When he first described the dying process to
Ms. Torso, she found it hard to listen. So they
shifted gears, talking about Greg's life and looking
at photos of him in better days.
On a
subsequent visit, Ms. Torso sought reassurance that
she would not "just fall apart." On another, Mr.
Fersko-Weiss told her there might come a moment when
she would have to give her son explicit permission to
die. She did — "You can go, Greggy. You can go
whenever you want" — toward the end of what would be a
68-hour vigil, involving 10 doulas (pronounced
DOO-lehs).
Gwen Lee's needs were different as she prepared for
the passing of her eldest sister, Vivienne, who died
at 60 after a 10-year battle with brain
cancer.
Years
of pretending that all was fine had given way, for
both of them, flight attendants from Ireland, to
acceptance. As Gwen put it, "We were prepared for the
end of her life, but no one else was." Some friends
and relatives began second-guessing the decisions,
arguing at Viv's bedside, arriving uninvited and
creating a "soap opera," Gwen said, "where we were
left trying to keep them happy."
It is
not uncommon, hospice workers say, for those not
involved in day-to-day care to bring their own fears
and conflict to the deathbed and inadvertently become
a burden. Into the tumult came Mr. Fersko-Weiss, a
Buddhist whose religion says that "what happens to the
soul is partly determined by how it leaves this life."
The scene of death, he said, is a "sacred space," and
the doula's job is to protect it.
To that
end, he and Gwen, 51, considered moving Vivienne, and
her two beloved cats, to an in-patient hospice where
they could control who visited. Just knowing there was
a fallback position reassured them.
"It
made all the difference," Gwen said. "Henry pulled me
out of the chaos and kept my head on the goal."
The
Vigil
Chloe
Tartaglia, a pre-med student, yoga teacher and former
birth doula, had never seen anyone die when she
volunteered for the vigil program.
She
learned the signs of imminent death in her 16-hour
training program, how to match her breathing to the
patient's and use visualization and aromatherapy to
calm everyone in the room. On the subway, headed to
her first case, Ms. Tartaglia, whose father was a
hospice physician, concentrated on her goal: to be
"like water and flow to the place where there's need."
She found herself in a shabby apartment near
New
York University.
A tiny woman lay in bed, wasting away from "failure to
thrive," Ms. Tartaglia had been told. The woman's
husband was terrified, venturing into the room only to
give her morphine, as he had been instructed by
hospice nurses.
The
woman's daughter, none too fond of her stepfather, was
at work, having left behind a phone number. Ms.
Tartaglia pulled a chair to the bedside.
For
five hours, Ms. Tartaglia said, she sat beside the
woman and held her hand "with intention," as she had
been taught, enclosing it between her own. She had no
sense of time passing until her shift was about to
end.
"I told
her I'd be leaving soon but that someone else was
coming and she wouldn't be alone," Ms. Tartaglia said.
Five
minutes later the woman died.
Ms.
Tartaglia called the daughter, who arrived calm and
efficient, ready for the logistics that follow death.
"I can't deal with him," she told Ms. Tartaglia as the
old man keened.
Ms.
Tartaglia guided him into the kitchen and fixed tea.
"You deal with yourself and your mom," she told the
daughter. Ms. Tartaglia followed her heart and
suggested a deathbed ritual. As she slipped from the
apartment, the daughter was combing her mother's hair.
There
would be more vigils for Ms. Tartaglia. One of the
most memorable, she said, included the chance to hear
Gwen Lee take her sister on whispered journeys to
places Vivienne had most loved in the days when being
a stewardess was glamorous.
With
one of Vivienne's cats at her head and the other
draped over her legs, Gwen would set the scene: An
overnight flight to Africa. Glaring sun as the cabin
doors open. Days between flights to romp at the beach
with captain and crew.
While
Gwen soothed her sister, Ms. Tartaglia lighted
candles. She massaged Gwen's feet, helped choose the
music for Vivienne's grand exit, Sarah Brightman
singing "Time to Say Goodbye."
Ms.
Tartaglia's shift ended three hours before Vivienne
died. As she left, Ms. Tartaglia removed the oxygen
mask that was intended to make Vivienne more
comfortable but was chafing her face.
The
Aftermath
A month
to the day after Dominggus Pasalbessy died, Mr. Fersko-Weiss
visited the three daughters who had cared for him.
This was a formal opportunity for Pat Jolly, 62, Helen
Santiago, 58, and Anita Pasalbessy, 55, to review
their experience. After a death, Mr. Fersko-Weiss told
them, "something said or not said, something you wish
you had done differently, can stick inside you like a
splinter."
The
lights were low in Ms. Pasalbessy's Riverside Drive
apartment, and Mr. Fersko-Weiss suggested a CD their
father had loved, music from the South Moluccan
islands, now part of Indonesia, the native land he had
left as a teenager on a tramp steamer. The sisters sat
for a brief meditation, letting the bustle of their
day be replaced with images of their father, who died
of lung cancer in the same bed where his wife had died
a dozen years earlier.
All
three described feeling peaceful and reverent at the
time of his passing. It was like being "inside a
cocoon," Ms. Pasalbessy said, "just me and my sisters,
and Daddy, all together, in a place where nothing bad
could touch us."
Only
when pressed did each recall her particular moment of
distress.
Ms.
Pasalbessy agonized that she had compromised the
independence of a man who "never wanted to be fussed
over." Mr. Fersko-Weiss reminded her that eventually
her father had stopped resisting his daughters'
ministrations and had told them, "You're good girls,
such good girls."
Ms.
Jolly's concern was whether they had adequately
medicated him. But her father's mantra had been "mind
over matter." Perhaps, Mr. Fersko-Weiss suggested, he
chose a measure of pain, rather than unawareness, as
an assertion of strength.
Ms.
Santiago had trouble forgetting the sisters'
squabbling as they tried to dress him, three
strong-willed women each with her own idea of how to
get his arm through a pajama sleeve. "He had to have
felt our tension, our nervousness," she said. "But
that's when you guys walked in and everything fell
into place."
Three
doulas were with the family, in shifts, from dusk on
April 9 until late afternoon on April 11. At 3:10
p.m., after a telltale rattling in his chest, Mr.
Pasalbessy let out a breath. Then another, as two
tears trickled down his cheek.
"It was
like we could hear you talking to us," Ms. Jolly told
Mr. Fersko-Weiss. " 'You'll see this. You'll hear a
certain breathing pattern.' This dying was such a
wonderful experience, if death can be that. And it's
because there was no fear of the unknown."
Top of Page
Kids Today-What They Want to Know
About Death
by NIJH Lecturer, Rabbi Earl E.
Grollman
What if?
What if God never took my father? Would he have
taken me instead? What if I never get through
this? Will people still look at me the way they did
before? Or will I be looked upon as a girl with no
father? Will life be as easy or will I have to try
extra hard?
What if my kids ask about their grandfather? What
will I tell them? That he died when I was just a
kid learning the lessons of life? Will they want to
see where he was buried? Will I be able to take
them?
What if?
Yes, children do ask
questions about death. The above were the inquiries
of a 14 year-old at Fernside, a Center for Grieving
Children in Cincinnati. When I wrote
Explaining Death to
Children almost four decades ago, youngsters
were then the forgotten mourners. At the time, the
whole discussion was a taboo subject. Somehow, many
people believed that if death were not discussed, it
would magically disappear.
Since that time we
have learned that just as we cannot protect
ourselves from life, so we cannot protect our
youngsters from death. Traumatic experiences belong
to both adulthood and childhood.
Where can one turn in
tragedy if no one will admit that there is a
tragedy? If loss can be acknowledged, we find
comfort in what we can mean to each other - even in
the midst of lingering pain and loneliness.
Death is a universal
and inevitable process that must be faced by people
of all ages. Children who are able to participate
with their families after the death of someone they
love will be better equipped to understand and
manage the emotions of their grief. It is in that
spirit that I share some of the most frequently
asked questions that have been posed to me. It is
important to know that in responding to a child's
question, keep in mind:
-
What does the child
need to know?
-
What does the child
want to know?
-
What can the child
understand?
It's okay to admit
that you don't have all the answers: No one does.
Even as you share with your children, you will gain
fresh insights for yourself. In other words, before
you can explain death to children, you have to begin
to explain it to yourself.
Why do people die?
Dying is a part of
life. Every living thing in the world - trees,
flowers, animals, and people - dies at the end of
life. As it says in the Bible, "To every thing
there is a season... a time to be born, a time to
die."
When do people die?
People die when their
bodies no longer work right. Sometimes people die
when they are very old. Other times people die
because they are very sick. Sometimes accidents
such as a car crash cause people to die, even young
children and babies.
When will I die?
No one can know when
you will die. We hope you will live a long,
healthy, happy life and die only when you are very
old.
Could you die at any time? Could I?
It's possible that an
accident could cause you or me to die suddenly, but
because we are well and healthy, we can expect to
live for a long, long time. We can help avoid
accidents by being careful when crossing streets,
for example, and by fastening our seatbelts when
riding in a car.
What do dead people do all the time?
(Be factual in
| | |