Current Articles


 

 

 

 

 



Click on a Title at Right

  1. Comforting the Mourner
    by Rabbi Maurice and Dodi Lee Lamm

  2. Life After Death: A Parable
    by Maurice Lamm

  3. I Do Believe
    by Jennifer Janiszewski

  4. Dos and Don’ts for Visitors to Make a Compassionate and Proper Condolence Call
    by Maurice Lamm

  5. Transcending the Distress-Itzhak Perlman
    by Maurice Lamm

  6. For the Families of the Dying, Coaching as the Hours Wane - A Condensed Article on Midwifing Death
    by Jane Gross
    Published in the New York Times: May 20, 2006

  7. Kids Today - What They Want to Know About Death
    by Rabbi Earl E. Grollman

  8. A Chance to Pick Hospice and Still Hope to Live
    by Reed Abelson
    Published in the New York Times: May 20, 2006

     

 
 

Comforting the Mourner

by Rabbi Maurice & Dodi Lee Lamm

From "A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO RABBINIC COUNSELING." By Rabbi Maurice Lamm & Dodi Lee Lamm, M.S.W. Edited by Yisrael N. Levitz and Abraham J. Twerski. Published by feldheim.com.

 

[This article, originally written for rabbis, was adapted for anyone who needs to comfort a close friend or relative. –Ed.]

One's first encounter with a mourner usually comes upon hearing the news of the death. The mourner may not have yet completely absorbed the finality of what happened. In that first encounter with the newly bereaved, one needs to connect both empathically and concretely. "When?" "How?" and "Where did it happen?" are appropriate questions. They are concrete and they simply seek information, but they allow the mourner to verbally relay a story that often feels surrealistic, even when the death was expected.

Other informational questions are also important to explore at this time. "Where were you when it happened?" "How did you find out?" "Do the other family members know?" "Have any arrangements for a burial been made?" This begins to connect one to the experience of the mourner. The mourner may not come to grips with the reality of the loss for a while, but this concrete stage is an important beginning.

This is also the time to let the mourner know that everything that can be done to give the deceased a respectful, honorable funeral is being done. At a time of total helplessness in being able to bring the deceased back to life, it is comforting for the person to know that an honorable funeral is being arranged. The mourner might even find that helping with the funeral arrangements is a great source of comfort...

Following the funeral, one needs to assess the mourner's desire for solitude upon returning from the cemetery and the immediate days following, and respect his preference. Solitude gives the mourner space to think and get past many perceived obstacles to the problem of continuing life after experiencing the ugliness of death and its shocking finality.

It is similarly important to respect the mourner's wish for silence. This is the reason why consolers traditionally need to wait for the mourner to speak first, thereby allowing him or her to set the agenda for their shiva call. Many mourners express their clear wish for everyone to "stay away." This should be honored. Silence gives mourners the space to reflect, feel what they need to feel, and collect themselves. Sometimes silence speaks volumes. Just being with the mourner sans speaking banalities and trivialities is exactly the support the mourner needs.

There is a counseling approach called active listening. Communication comes in all forms, including speech, emotional response, and body language. For example, it is important to maintain good eye contact. It conveys to the mourner that you are not uncomfortable dealing with death and listening to the mourner's unvarnished feelings. Empathy can often be conveyed with a calm presence, eye contact, attentiveness, and a display of genuine interest. These are very effective in establishing a connection with the mourner and are also central components for consoling the bereaved.

Reflecting back is a way of letting the mourner know that you understand correctly what has been said and that you are listening with interest. The mourner may tend to contradict or even repeat himself because he is in the process of working through difficult emotions. When you reflect back, you make it permissible for the mourner to revisit and clarify his thoughts and feelings once again. It is a way of showing respect for the process of grieving and consoling. Paraphrasing a mourner's most important comments lends them importance while checking them for accuracy.

Some emotions exhibited while grieving can be overwhelming and frightening to both the mourner and the listener. When a rabbi is able to "mirror feelings" and reflect back a sense that the emotions are significant, he makes it safe for the mourner to express all that he is feeling. A mourner might say, "I don't know what to do," and you might reply, "It sounds like you are feeling a bit lost right now."

It is important to ask questions rather than to toss out stock answers. Mourners do not want to hear theological insights, justifications, apologetics, comparative war stories, or even your personal approach on how to make peace with tragedy. Empathy and understanding are what is called for - active listening and mirrored feelings, not long discourses on why bad things happen to good people.

There are also things that shouldn't be said, because they show insensitivity and a lack of empathy. Don't say, for example: "It could've been worse," "You need to get on with your life," "You'll have other children," "Don't take it so hard," or "Other people have lost their beloved." Remember, too, that the word "beloved" may not be appropriate. The deceased may not have in fact been loved.

Handle memories deftly. Screened memories, those that are not remembered accurately but as the individual wants or needs them to be, are common for mourners. These memories may not be objectively accurate, but they are often comforting to the person who is telling them. We unconsciously choose what we can handle and avoid that which is too threatening, primarily because it hurts too much. Sometimes good memories become paramount to the exclusion of other memories that might threaten how the mourner wants to remember the deceased. It is not necessary to correct those memories. Again, we are there just to listen.

There are several other important considerations to be mindful of when consoling the bereaved. Narrative, for example, is the quintessential agenda of all consolation strategies. This means that mourners should be encouraged to speak of their loss. Perhaps the most helpful words of consolation are: "Tell me what she was like." The mourner's repeating of this narrative, sometimes with a new twist or emphasis (depending on the listeners and the person's own new insights) brings him closer to closure. By the end of a successful shiva, the mourner has packaged a cogent story, with a beginning and an end and a logical progression of events to store in his mind for safekeeping. Slowly it dawns on him that he now understands what happened and that he can place it in its proper proportion. He is, of course, still bereaved.

Encourage the retelling of stories ― about the deceased, about his death, about his final days ― and the feelings that accompanied these events. The more one tells the story, the more one is able to make the death more real. Telling the story with all its pain is a partner to the healing process.

Top of Page


The Invention of Hope


Judaism is not a skein of charming folkways. It is idealism and faith, law and love, literature and history and a way of life. It connects people to God and creates a working relationship. The holyday prayer book lists the many ways we love God: "We are your sons, and you our Father...We are your friends, and you are our beloved...."


But less known is the realization that Judaism may have made one of its greatest contributions when it actualized a dormant human feature that hides shyly in everyone's heart: Hope. Hope is the sheer will to live on in the face of despair, to picture a better future, to spark a rise to success and an end to suffering. The Jewish people survived pogroms and holocausts because of this one quality.

Think of it: there is virtually no forward movement in life, no projecting and no planning, unless it is preceded by a robust Hope that craves some distant goal. Hope performs remarkable calisthenics. If you lose hope in something, you instinctively hope for a different objective. Hope changes itself in tandem with your personal development - if you are successful your hope leaps ahead to goals out-of-reach; if you are young, your Hopes are probably ecstatic; as you get older the worn mind looks for other pastures. What are the hidden mechanisms that trigger this Hope that drives us into the future? What enables this boldness, this resilience, this "impossible" vision?

If you look under the hood of Hope, you will find a remarkable spiritual engine whose major component is Faith - a belief in One God. There is a specific moment in history when a spiritual revolution overturned man's outlook on the world - the emergence of the idea of One God. It snatched Hope - which had been a charming gadget buried in a Pandora's box - and shaped it into one of the most powerful forces in human evolution and implanted it into everyone's imagination.

It accomplished this by making a striking observation that released a flood of spiritual energies. It affirmed that God actually listens to people who petition Him, that He desires their good, and that he responds - for good or ill. This was a radical idea at the time (perhaps even now), and it struck at the pith of the pagan mind which considered a relationship between a man and a god to be untenable.

By claiming a belief in one God who is a single, almighty, and totally ethical entity, who nonetheless responds to insignificant people like you and me, Judaism challenged Paganism in a war to the death to mold the minds of the civilized world. The combat swirled around these questions:

Is it possible that a supernatural power was interested in earthly problems?
Does God have the power to implement such solutions in real time?
Is it sensible for a person to hope for a distant, unrealizable possibility?
The Jewish prophets thundered "yes!" to all three questions, and vanquished a paganism that said "no!" to them all. By breaking the shackles of pagan dogma, the Jewish faith empowered people to Hope, and built it into the powerful notion that it is today. How could anyone make a personal appeal to a force that is indiscriminate, unresponsive, and impersonal? Whom do you petition for relief? To which window do you bring your complaint, if there is no one at the desk? Is there anything at all, that any one at all, can do to make life just a bit easier? Because it - Judaism - spoke of a God in heaven to whom people could direct their dreams with great enthusiasm, and who could respond positively to their cries, it transfigured Hope from a nebulous, gaseous, fanciful, and even dangerous myth (as the Greeks labeled it) into a serious, structured, spiritual pursuit that Judaism proclaimed. Hope illuminated the distant horizons of a dark world.

The 19th century Christian existentialist philosopher, Søren Kierkegaard, believed that this commitment to Hope, "…made the Jewish religion, of all religions, outspoken optimism. Greek pagan thought is optimistic, but is tinged with deep melancholy, and had no Divine sanction. Judaism is Divinely-sanctioned optimism, sheer promise for this life."

It could not be otherwise. A religion that taught the world that every person is created in the image of God had to be optimistic and hopeful. If we are spiritual facsimiles of God, we have the power to be creative, as He is, and we can strive to modify or eliminate suffering, tragedy, and evil of all kinds. By stimulating people not to accept evil passively, and encouraging them to do combat against the horrors of life, faith in God became a source of great Hope. Religion told the ancient world that when things are bad, we can reasonably hope for a new beginning.

This revolution translated beliefs into practical propositions. To the man on the street this meant that he had an address to whom he could appeal when he was in trouble, even if it was in heaven. It meant that God could, and very well might, respond with help - perhaps a new cure or a new opportunity. Immediately, the earth became a friendlier, cozier, more hospitable place in which to spend a lifetime.

If paganism had succeeded, the quality of Hope built into every human being would have been useless, the spiritual tonsils of the human imagination, benign but ineffectual - a joke in the throat of man's desperation. The One-God revolution made radical breaks with Paganism that swiftly transformed man's thinking, but the spark that began it all was Judaism's belief in One God who created the world with design, purpose and meaning. It chose personal destiny over random fate.

The Greeks believed that whatever happens to a person is entirely the result of random forces. If disease strikes a person, it does so by sheer coincidence. Victims of a disaster are simply "accidents," not subjects, of history. Whether you love or hurt your neighbor, whether you abuse your wife or respect her, whether or not you defraud your business partner, are matters that have no bearing on what befalls you - because nature has no master design and no master designer, no purpose and, therefore, no meaning. Life is a collection of random events. Good luck.

This is the reason whole pagan societies like Mesopotamia historically were shot through with depression and anxiety. If you were a Mesopotamian, how could you make sense of your life? These doubts were the seeds of hopelessness that characterized Greek tragedy. That is why the overwhelming majority of thinkers in pagan Greece and Rome, in poems and plays, mocked the idea of hope and called it a fairy tale. These illustrious cultures brought the world a cornucopia of aesthetics, poetry, logic, and philosophy -but they robbed humanity of a rudimentary element of living that sustains people every day of their lives.

The Jewish idea of One God, however, was a shaft of light that shone through the thick clouds of Pagan culture and radiated the idea that the world is actually good, despite rampant suffering; that people are actually people, not discarded debris tossed helter-skelter on the turbulent ocean of history, subject not to a random fate, but to Divine destiny. The belief in One God ultimately dominated all civilization and paganism quickly began to fade. Hope instantly sprang into existence, creating a new reality. Monotheistic religion became the cradle of optimism, while Paganism suffered fits of melancholy until finally it collapsed.

Could the Jews have lived through the twentieth century without Hope? How could Jews have survived their children being clubbed to death by storm troopers? Only with Hope. Elie Wiesel found a sign over the doors to the Breslav synagogue in Warsaw that read "Gevalt Jews! Don't give up."

How curious to feel the flesh of hope in today's events. A thousand years ago, Christian crusaders incinerated our children, our homes, and our synagogues. At the end of this Christian millennium, Cardinal O'Connor of New York wrote a letter that is a historic document. It is a Rosh Hashanah greeting to Jews - an apology for the misdeeds of the last thousand years, saying that his people repent, "do Teshuva." He prays for a longer Jewish-Catholic embrace and wishes us Shana Tovah.

We raged against the dying of the light, we hoped against hope, and we succeeded. The word, Hope, is Tikvah in Hebrew. Is it coincidental that "Hatikvah" is Israel's national anthem? If we look at the bottom line today, at the end of our secular millennium, we can say proudly and confidently that our faith in God gave us Hope and that our Hope sustained us. Thank God.

Rabbi Maurice Lamm is an internationally renowned author, President of the National Institute for Jewish Hospice and Professor at Yeshiva University's Rabbinical Seminary in New York. He was the rabbi of Beth Jacob Congregation in Beverly Hills from 1972 until his retirement in 1985. Rabbi Lamm's latest book, The Power of Hope, was recently translated into Spanish, Greek and Chinese. His most popular work, The Jewish Way in Death and Mourning, is considered one of the seven best Jewish books by the New York Times. Rabbi Lamm is also author of The Jewish Way in Love and Marriage, Becoming a Jew and Living Torah in America.

 

Top of Page


Life After Death: A Parable


Man has had an abiding faith in a world beyond the grave. The conviction in a life after death, improvable but unshakeable, has been cherished since the beginning of thinking man's life on earth. It makes its appearance in religious literature not as fiat, commanded irrevocably by an absolute God, but rather arises plant-like, growing and developing naturally in the soul. It then sprouts forth through sublime prayer and sacred hymn. Only later does it become extrapolated in complicated metaphysical speculation.

The after-life has not been "thought up"; it is not a rational construction of a religious philosophy imposed on believing man. It has sprung from within the hearts of masses of men, a sort of consensus Pentium, inside out, a hope beyond and above the rational, a longing for the warm sun of eternity. The after-life is not a theory to be proven logically or demonstrated by rational analysis. It is axiomatic. It is to the soul what oxygen is to the lungs. There is little meaning to life, to God, to man's constant strivings, to all of his achievements, unless there is a world beyond the grave.

The Bible, so vitally concerned with the actions of man in this world, and agonizing over his day-to-day morals, is relatively silent about the world-to-come. But, precisely, this very silence is a tribute to the awesome concept, taken for granted like the oxygen in the atmosphere. No elaborate apologia, no complex abstractions are necessary. The Bible, which records the sacred dialogue between God and man, surely must be founded on the soul's eternal existence. It was not a matter of debate, as it became later in history when whole movements interpreted scripture with slavish literalism and could not find the after-life crystallized in letters and words, or later, when philosophers began to apply the yardstick of rationalism to man's every hope and idea and sought empirical proof for this conviction of the soul. It was a fundamental creed, always present, though rarely articulated.

If the soul is immortal then death cannot be considered a final act. If the life of the soul is to be continued, then death, however bitter, is deprived of its treacherous power of casting mourners into a lifetime of agonizing hopelessness over an irretrievable loss. Terrible though it is, death is a threshold to a new world-the "world-to-come."

A Parable

An imaginative and telling analogy that conveys the hope and confidence in the after-life, even though this hope must be refracted through the prism of death, is the tale of twins awaiting birth in the mother's womb. It was created by a contemporary Israeli rabbi, the late Y. M. Tuckachinsky.

Imagine twins growing peacefully in the warmth of the womb. Their mouths are closed, and they are being fed via the navel. Their lives are serene. The whole world, to these brothers, is the interior of the womb. Who could conceive anything larger, better, more comfortable? They begin to wonder: "We are getting lower and lower. Surely if it continues, we will exit one day. What will happen after we exit?"

Now the first infant is a believer. He is heir to a religious tradition which tells him that there will be a "new life" after this wet and warm existence of the womb. A strange belief, seemingly without foundation, but one to which he holds fast. The second infant is a thorough-going skeptic. Mere stories do not deceive him. He believes only in that which can be demonstrated. He is enlightened, and tolerates no idle conjecture. What is not within one's experience can have no basis in one's imagination.

Says the faithful brother: "After our 'death' here, there will be a new great world. We will eat through the mouth! We will see great distances, and we will hear through the ears on the sides of our heads. Why, our feet will be straightened! And our heads-up and free, rather than down and boxed in."

Replies the skeptic: "Nonsense. You're straining your imagination again. There is no foundation for this belief. It is only your survival instinct, an elaborate defense mechanism, a historically-conditioned subterfuge. You are looking for something to calm your fear of 'death.' There is only this world. There is no world-to-come!"

"Well then," asks the first, "what do you say it will be like?"

The second brother snappily replies with all the assurance of the slightly knowledgeable: "We will go with a bang. Our world will collapse and we will sink into oblivion. No more. Nothing. Black void. An end to consciousness. Forgotten. This may not be a comforting thought, but it is a logical one."

Suddenly the water inside the womb bursts. The womb convulses. Upheaval. Turmoil. Writhing. Everything lets loose. Then a mysterious pounding -- a crushing, staccato pounding. Faster, faster, lower, lower.

The believing brother exits. Tearing himself from the womb, he falls outward. The second brother shrieks, startled by the "accident" befallen his brother. He bewails and bemoans the tragedy--the death of a perfectly fine fellow. Why? Why? Why didn't he take better care? Why did he fall into that terrible abyss?

As he thus laments, he hears a head-splitting cry, and a great tumult from the black abyss, and he trembles: "Oh my! What a horrible end! As I predicted!"

Meanwhile as the skeptic brother mourns, his "dead" brother has been born into the "new" world. The headsplitting cry is a sign of health and vigor, and the tumult is really a chorus of mazel tons sounded by the waiting family thanking God for the birth of a healthy son.

Indeed, in the words of a contemporary thinker, man comes from the darkness of the "not yet," and proceeds to the darkness of the "no more." While it is difficult to imagine the "not yet" it is more difficult to picture the "no more."

As we separate and "die" from the womb, only to be born to life, so we separate and die from our world, only to be re-born to life eternal. The exit from the womb is the birth of the body. The exit from the body is the birth of the soul. As the womb requires a gestation period of nine months, the world requires a residence of 70 or 80 years. As the womb is prozdor, an anteroom preparatory to life, so our present existence is a prozdor to the world beyond.

Reprinted from ChabadofBeverlywood.com

 

Top of Page


 

There is a fascinating insight that maintains that we could prove the existence of God -- not by scientific theories, nor by scripture, nor by miracles — but by the stunning existence of people who act selflessly, without being commanded, without being compensated, without fuss and without fanfare.  They are unremarkable, unassuming paragons of virtue. Jewish tradition calls this Kiddush Ha’shem, the sanctification of God’s name.  People commonly call such individuals “angels.”  Spiritual-minded people call the stories of such simple, yet incredible, individuals: a rumor of angels.

This fact, by itself, could testify to the existence of God, an all-wise Creator who ordered the world with a hidden infrastructure of decency. “You don’t have to be a saint to be an angel”, the great doctor in Africa said; but you do have to be a selfless, self-sacrificing person. If that is who you are, you will be testifying to the existence of a benevolent creator.

Watch a mother caring for her sick child, kissing and hugging her, hovering over her bed all night, offering to be sick in place of her little girl. That is a rumor of angels. If a person can become an “angel,” then a God of goodness must exist.

There is “God” in “good”.

 Excerpted from CONSOLATION

Top of Page


 

Top of Page


 

Dos and Don’ts for Visitors to Make a Compassionate and Proper Condolence Call


by Maurice Lamm

 

  • Allow mourners to begin the conversation and set the tone at all times. This is a religious must. Be especially sensitive in situations such as suicide, young deaths, or guilt-ridden grief.
  • Do not to try to fix the problems and fears of the grief-stricken. Recognize that we cannot solve the mourners’ problems no matter how well equipped we are and how hard we try.
  • Be an open listener. Allow mourners an opportunity to express all of their feelings in a safe, non-combative, non-threatening, and nonjudgmental atmosphere so they can break through their loneliness and share their pain and loss for a short time. The grief-stricken need friends to validate their grief, not to interpret or manipulate their feelings.
  • Listen attentively, not casually. We should demonstrate concern for mourners’ well-being. We should wear a mien of seriousness, not sadness, on our faces.
  • Sometimes silence is best. We are better advised to say nothing at all than to be endlessly talkative.
  • Our conversation should be not only distracting but therapeutic as well. The small talk of mourners should trigger our interest, even though it may not be of world-shaking significance.
  • Speak of the departed. This may appear hurtful at first, but in fact it helps mourners unburden themselves. We should feel free to recall events in the deceased’s life, the departed one’s opinions on important matters, and the quality of the deceased’s relationships. Whether or not the deceased was an important personality, every individual has redeeming features and has done good things. We should seek these features in our memory and speak them aloud.
  • Use humor wisely. Sometimes joking and raucous stories bring relief to comforters, but these things are entirely inappropriate for mourners. Conversely, light-hearted, even humorous, anecdotes of the deceased person, spoken respectfully, are quite in place. In fact, it is altogether proper to provide for some moments of appropriate levity to relieve the thick, emotion-laden atmosphere—but only if we feel at ease and if we able to  deliver such anecdotes with sensitivity.
  • Do not dwell on our own mourning experiences. This may appear to belittle the grief of the newly bereaved. Consolation is not about how we suffered or how we experienced grief. Mourners are at the center of concern; everything else should be peripheral.
  • Remind mourners, whenever possible, that their feelings are normal. Let them know that the seemingly “crazy” symptoms of grief are universal and that the vast majority of people have successfully dealt with loss in the past.
  • Encourage mourners’ independence and offer positive feedback on their successful coping or small victories in the progress of their bereavement. Believe in their ability to recover and grieve successfully. Giving people courage makes them courageous. Phillips Brooks once said: “There is in every man something greater than he had begun to dream of. Men are nobler than they think themselves.”2
  • Do not offer gratuitous psychological advice. Even the most talented and capable comforters must be wary of falling into this trap.
  • Remember that there is no religious preference for visiting a house of mourning—whether by day or by night. For non-relatives, visits may be delayed until the second day after interment. However, if for some reason this delay cannot be arranged, visits may be made even on the very first day. Formally and traditionally, consoling the bereaved begins at the cemetery when mourners leave the grave and pass through parallel rows of friends and relatives as they exit.
  • We do not customarily pay condolence calls on the Sabbath or holidays. These are days when traditional Jews do not mourn publicly, since mourning would conflict with the joyous spirit of the celebration for the whole Jewish community. However, mourners may receive shiva visitation and condolences on certain special days: chol ha’mo’ed (the weekdays of major holidays), Rosh Hodesh (the start of a new Jewish month), Purim, and Hanukkah. Psychologically, of course, grief often reaches crucial and anguishing proportions during holidays. Mourners tend, at these times—as on birthdays and anniversaries, to feel abandoned and alone, truly bereft. So it is well to visit mourners just before and as soon as possible at the end of such a traditionally mandated break in the mourning.
  • Visiting after Shiva. If we were unable to visit during Shiva, tradition says that we can continue to express condolences at any time during the subsequent twelve months upon meeting those bereaved of parents and during the next thirty days for those bereaved of other relatives.
  • When mourners return to work. Sometimes mourners need to conduct business during Shiva. Sometimes it is even religiously permissible to do so. In such cases, condolence calls may still be made to mourners.
  • When making condolence calls, offer no words of greeting—neither of welcome nor of farewell. Mourners should not respond verbally to greetings during the first three days. Traditionally, mourners nod or convey their acknowledgment of the presence of comforters in some other way, such as by repeating a visitor’s name.
  • It is not up to us as comforters to remind mourners of their religious duties. For instance, we should not urge a mourner to sit on the shiva stool (it is not even religiously required that the mourner always be seated), since our innocent remark may imply to the mourner that he or she is acting improperly.

 

As consolers we should be sensitive to the feelings of the mourners and be especially alert to any signal that we should leave! There is a time for all things and surely there is a time for leaving the house of the bereaved. We should never stay too long, mistakenly believing that our presence brings an unusual degree of relief or mistakenly measuring the value of our compassion by the length of our visit. Upon leaving, we traditionally recite the following phrase in Hebrew or in English or both: “Ha’makom yenachem etkhem betokh she’ar avelei Tziyon vi’Yerushalayim” (May God comfort you among the other mourners of Zion and Jerusalem).3

 

We should expect some unusual behavior during a shiva call, behavior motivated by Jewish tradition itself. Mourners traditionally do not rise to greet any guest, no matter what guest’s stature. Mourners—preferably but not necessarily—sit, even as comforters are about to leave. Nevertheless, especially during prolonged visits, mourners need not sit all the time, but may stand and walk as they desire. At mealtime, in the company of guests, mourners may sit at the head of the table but on a lower stool.

 

Top of Page


Transcending the Distress - Itzhak Perlman

by Maurice Lamm

On Nov. 18, 1995, Itzhak Perlman, the violinist, came on stage to give a
concert at Lincoln Center in New York City. If you have ever been to a
Perlman concert, you know that getting on stage is no small achievement for
him. He was stricken with polio as a child, and has braces on both legs and
walks with the aid of two crutches.

To see him walk across the stage one step at a time, painfully and slowly,
is a sight. He walks painfully, yet majestically, until he reaches his
chair. Then he sits down, slowly, puts his crutches on the floor, undoes the
clasps on his legs, tucks one foot back and extends the other foot forward.
Then he bends down and picks up the violin, puts it under his chin, nods to
the conductor and proceeds to play.

By now, the audience is used to this ritual. They sit quietly while he makes
his way across the stage to his chair. They remain reverently silent while
he undoes the clasps on his legs. They wait until he is ready to play.

But this time, something went wrong. Just as he finished the first few bars,
one of the strings on his violin broke. You could hear it snap—it went
off like gunfire across the room. There was no mistaking what that sound
meant. There was no mistaking what he had to do.

People who were there that night thought to themselves: “We figured that he
would have to get up, put on the clasps again, pick up the crutches and limp
his way off stage - to either find another violin or else find another
string for this one, or wait for someone to bring him another."

But he didn’t. Instead, he waited a moment, closed his eyes and then
signaled the conductor to begin again. The orchestra began, and he played
from where he had left off. And he played with such passion and such power
and such purity, as they had never heard before.

Of course, anyone knows that it is impossible to play a symphonic work with
just three strings. I know that; you know that. But that night Itzhak
Perlman refused to know that. You could see him modulating, changing, and
recomposing the piece in his head. At one point, it sounded like he was
de-tuning the strings to get new sounds from them that they had never made
before.

When he finished, there was an awesome silence in the room. And then people
rose and cheered. There was an extraordinary outburst of applause from every
corner of the auditorium. Everyone was on their feet, screaming and
cheering, doing everything they could to show how much they appreciated what
he had done.

He smiled, wiped the sweat from his brow, raised his bow to quiet the
audience, and then he said, not boastfully, but in a quiet, pensive,
reverent tone, “You know, sometimes it is the artist’s task to find out how
much music you can still make with what you have left."

What a powerful line that is. And who knows? Perhaps that is the way of
life - not just for an artist but for all of us. Here is a man who has
prepared all his life to make music on a violin with four strings, who all
of a sudden, in the middle of a concert, finds himself with only three
strings, and the music he made that night with just three strings was more
beautiful, more sacred, more memorable, than any that he had ever made
before, when he had four strings.

So, perhaps our task in this shaky, fast-changing, bewildering world in
which we live, is to make music, at first with all that we have, and then,
when that is no longer possible, to make music with what we have left.

In this year where so much has been taken from us all, let us all stop for a
moment, and think how we can make beautiful music with what we have left.

Excerpted from CONSOLATION, 231, by Maurice Lamm

Top of Page

.
For the Families of the Dying, Coaching as the Hours Wane - A Condensed Article on Midwifing Death


By JANE GROSS

Published in the New York Times: May 20, 2006

Greg Torso's death announced itself with a long exhale and then silence, as the breath literally left his body. His mother had been told to expect this, so she was not scared.

 

Ms. Torso had worried that an undertaker would barge in moments after her 42-year-old son died, before she had had time to say goodbye. She had been assured she could spend as much time with the body as she wanted.

Could she bathe and dress him? Save a lock of his hair? Commemorate his passing with wine and reminiscence at the bedside? All of that was fine, she had been told, setting the stage for a death that she later said had left her "on the edge of euphoria."

Ms. Torso was coached and consoled through the final days and hours of her son's life, a rarity even under the umbrella of hospice, which for three decades has promised Americans a good death, pain-free, peaceful and shared with loved ones at home.

But there is a growing realization that hospice has its limitations. Doctors, nurses, social workers, clerics and volunteers are rarely there for the final hours, known as active dying, when a family may need their comforts the most.

Now those final moments are a focus of new attention as hospices broaden their range of services, inspired by a growing body of research on the very end of life. More are encouraging the calming properties of music, meditation, aromatherapy and massage for both patients and families. Some are increasing the training for so-called 11th-hour companions who families can request be with them.

Holding a dying person's hand may be frightening for a loved one alone at the bedside. Relatives and friends may not know that hearing is the last sense to go, and neglect to soothe the patient with a steady, reassuring murmur. Leaving the room briefly may mean missing the moment of passing and always carrying that regret.

"These final moments matter, but often, when families and patients need us most — to explain the process, calm the situation, take away the negative energy and allow them to be more present — we aren't there," said Henry Fersko-Weiss, vice president for counseling services at Continuum Hospice Care in New York City, which has a new program that has been keeping vigil with the dying and their families.

The American hospice movement has grown from one program in 1974 to 3,650 in 2004, serving eight million Americans, according to the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization. And more people are expected to choose hospice care as it extends its reach into hospitals and nursing homes, where palliative care is not routinely available. At the same time, those who seek aggressive treatment up to the end are welcome at hospice programs that once turned them away but that are now "open access."

Despite all these changes, most people, in fear or denial, wait until the last minute to enroll. That robs them of the preparation that was so vital to Greg Torso's mother, Carol, and that hospice leaders, like Andy Duncan of the national organization, say should be routine.

"Actually coaching and counseling people through the time of active dying," Mr. Duncan said, "is something we hope to convince every hospice in the nation to do."

Preparing

The Torsos were the first to use Continuum's vigil program, which has coached and consoled a dozen families in its first year.

Greg had survived 15 years with AIDS and related cancers. When his doctor said further treatment would be useless, Mr. Torso enrolled in hospice, and welcomed extra help from Mr. Fersko-Weiss and 29 specially trained volunteers who call themselves doulas.

That is a Greek term for women who serve, more commonly at home births to assist both midwife and mother. But the guiding philosophy is the same and borrows from Eastern religions: to honor the end of life as well as the beginning.

Mr. Fersko-Weiss is a gentle man who insinuates himself slowly. When he first described the dying process to Ms. Torso, she found it hard to listen. So they shifted gears, talking about Greg's life and looking at photos of him in better days.

On a subsequent visit, Ms. Torso sought reassurance that she would not "just fall apart." On another, Mr. Fersko-Weiss told her there might come a moment when she would have to give her son explicit permission to die. She did — "You can go, Greggy. You can go whenever you want" — toward the end of what would be a 68-hour vigil, involving 10 doulas (pronounced DOO-lehs).

Gwen Lee's needs were different as she prepared for the passing of her eldest sister, Vivienne, who died at 60 after a 10-year battle with brain cancer.

Years of pretending that all was fine had given way, for both of them, flight attendants from Ireland, to acceptance. As Gwen put it, "We were prepared for the end of her life, but no one else was." Some friends and relatives began second-guessing the decisions, arguing at Viv's bedside, arriving uninvited and creating a "soap opera," Gwen said, "where we were left trying to keep them happy."

It is not uncommon, hospice workers say, for those not involved in day-to-day care to bring their own fears and conflict to the deathbed and inadvertently become a burden. Into the tumult came Mr. Fersko-Weiss, a Buddhist whose religion says that "what happens to the soul is partly determined by how it leaves this life." The scene of death, he said, is a "sacred space," and the doula's job is to protect it.

To that end, he and Gwen, 51, considered moving Vivienne, and her two beloved cats, to an in-patient hospice where they could control who visited. Just knowing there was a fallback position reassured them.

"It made all the difference," Gwen said. "Henry pulled me out of the chaos and kept my head on the goal."

The Vigil

Chloe Tartaglia, a pre-med student, yoga teacher and former birth doula, had never seen anyone die when she volunteered for the vigil program.

She learned the signs of imminent death in her 16-hour training program, how to match her breathing to the patient's and use visualization and aromatherapy to calm everyone in the room. On the subway, headed to her first case, Ms. Tartaglia, whose father was a hospice physician, concentrated on her goal: to be "like water and flow to the place where there's need."

She found herself in a shabby apartment near New York University. A tiny woman lay in bed, wasting away from "failure to thrive," Ms. Tartaglia had been told. The woman's husband was terrified, venturing into the room only to give her morphine, as he had been instructed by hospice nurses.

The woman's daughter, none too fond of her stepfather, was at work, having left behind a phone number. Ms. Tartaglia pulled a chair to the bedside.

For five hours, Ms. Tartaglia said, she sat beside the woman and held her hand "with intention," as she had been taught, enclosing it between her own. She had no sense of time passing until her shift was about to end.

"I told her I'd be leaving soon but that someone else was coming and she wouldn't be alone," Ms. Tartaglia said.

Five minutes later the woman died.

Ms. Tartaglia called the daughter, who arrived calm and efficient, ready for the logistics that follow death. "I can't deal with him," she told Ms. Tartaglia as the old man keened.

Ms. Tartaglia guided him into the kitchen and fixed tea. "You deal with yourself and your mom," she told the daughter. Ms. Tartaglia followed her heart and suggested a deathbed ritual. As she slipped from the apartment, the daughter was combing her mother's hair.

There would be more vigils for Ms. Tartaglia. One of the most memorable, she said, included the chance to hear Gwen Lee take her sister on whispered journeys to places Vivienne had most loved in the days when being a stewardess was glamorous.

With one of Vivienne's cats at her head and the other draped over her legs, Gwen would set the scene: An overnight flight to Africa. Glaring sun as the cabin doors open. Days between flights to romp at the beach with captain and crew.

While Gwen soothed her sister, Ms. Tartaglia lighted candles. She massaged Gwen's feet, helped choose the music for Vivienne's grand exit, Sarah Brightman singing "Time to Say Goodbye."

Ms. Tartaglia's shift ended three hours before Vivienne died. As she left, Ms. Tartaglia removed the oxygen mask that was intended to make Vivienne more comfortable but was chafing her face.

The Aftermath

A month to the day after Dominggus Pasalbessy died, Mr. Fersko-Weiss visited the three daughters who had cared for him. This was a formal opportunity for Pat Jolly, 62, Helen Santiago, 58, and Anita Pasalbessy, 55, to review their experience. After a death, Mr. Fersko-Weiss told them, "something said or not said, something you wish you had done differently, can stick inside you like a splinter."

The lights were low in Ms. Pasalbessy's Riverside Drive apartment, and Mr. Fersko-Weiss suggested a CD their father had loved, music from the South Moluccan islands, now part of Indonesia, the native land he had left as a teenager on a tramp steamer. The sisters sat for a brief meditation, letting the bustle of their day be replaced with images of their father, who died of lung cancer in the same bed where his wife had died a dozen years earlier.

All three described feeling peaceful and reverent at the time of his passing. It was like being "inside a cocoon," Ms. Pasalbessy said, "just me and my sisters, and Daddy, all together, in a place where nothing bad could touch us."

Only when pressed did each recall her particular moment of distress.

Ms. Pasalbessy agonized that she had compromised the independence of a man who "never wanted to be fussed over." Mr. Fersko-Weiss reminded her that eventually her father had stopped resisting his daughters' ministrations and had told them, "You're good girls, such good girls."

Ms. Jolly's concern was whether they had adequately medicated him. But her father's mantra had been "mind over matter." Perhaps, Mr. Fersko-Weiss suggested, he chose a measure of pain, rather than unawareness, as an assertion of strength.

Ms. Santiago had trouble forgetting the sisters' squabbling as they tried to dress him, three strong-willed women each with her own idea of how to get his arm through a pajama sleeve. "He had to have felt our tension, our nervousness," she said. "But that's when you guys walked in and everything fell into place."

Three doulas were with the family, in shifts, from dusk on April 9 until late afternoon on April 11. At 3:10 p.m., after a telltale rattling in his chest, Mr. Pasalbessy let out a breath. Then another, as two tears trickled down his cheek.

"It was like we could hear you talking to us," Ms. Jolly told Mr. Fersko-Weiss. " 'You'll see this. You'll hear a certain breathing pattern.' This dying was such a wonderful experience, if death can be that. And it's because there was no fear of the unknown."

Top of Page


Kids Today-What They Want to Know About Death
 

by NIJH Lecturer, Rabbi Earl E. Grollman
 
What if?
What if God never took my father?   Would he have taken me instead?  What if I never get through this?  Will people still look at me the way they did before?  Or will I be looked upon as a girl with no father?  Will life be as easy or will I have to try extra hard?
 
What if my kids ask about their grandfather?  What will I tell them?  That he died when I was just a kid learning the lessons of life?  Will they want to see where he was buried?  Will I be able to take them?
What if?
 
Yes, children do ask questions about death. The above were the inquiries of a 14 year-old at Fernside, a Center for Grieving Children in Cincinnati.  When I wrote Explaining Death to Children almost four decades ago, youngsters were then the forgotten mourners.  At the time, the whole discussion was a taboo subject.  Somehow, many people believed that if death were not discussed, it would magically disappear.
 
Since that time we have learned that just as we cannot protect ourselves from life, so we cannot protect our youngsters from death.  Traumatic experiences belong to both adulthood and childhood.
 
Where can one turn in tragedy if no one will admit that there is a tragedy?  If loss can be acknowledged, we find comfort in what we can mean to each other - even in the midst of lingering pain and loneliness.
 
Death is a universal and inevitable process that must be faced by people of all ages.  Children who are able to participate with their families after the death of someone they love will be better equipped to understand and manage the emotions of their grief.  It is in that spirit that I share some of the most frequently asked questions that have been posed to me.  It is important to know that in responding to a child's question, keep in mind:
  • What does the child need to know?
  • What does the child want to know?
  • What can the child understand?
It's okay to admit that you don't have all the answers:  No one does.  Even as you share with your children, you will gain fresh insights for yourself.  In other words, before you can explain death to children, you have to begin to explain it to yourself.
 
Why do people die?
 
Dying is a part of life.  Every living thing in the world - trees, flowers, animals, and people - dies at the end of life.  As it says in the Bible, "To every thing there is a season... a time to be born, a time to die."
 
When do people die?
 
People die when their bodies no longer work right.  Sometimes people die when they are very old.  Other times people die because they are very sick.  Sometimes accidents such as a car crash cause people to die, even young children and babies.
 
When will I die?
 
No one can know when you will die.  We hope you will live a long, healthy, happy life and die only when you are very old.
 
Could you die at any time?  Could I?
 
It's possible that an accident could cause you or me to die suddenly, but because we are well and healthy, we can expect to live for a long, long time.  We can help avoid accidents by being careful when crossing streets, for example, and by fastening our seatbelts when riding in a car.
 
What do dead people do all the time?
 
(Be factual in